ULFA – new face of terror

assam-ulfa-terrorIn 13 different incidents reported since January 5, from the districts of Tinsukia, Dibrugarh, Sivasagar and Dhemaji, the United Liberation Front of Asom is reported to have mowed down in cold blood about 60 poor workers from Bihar who had gone to Assam to earn their living as milk vendors, workers in brick kilns etc. These workers — all Hindi speakers — were allegedly separated from Assamese-speaking workers living in the same area and were shot dead at point blank range with hand-held weapons.

This is not the first time that ULFA had indulged in such brutal tactics to intimidate people from other parts of India living in Assam and force them to leave. It had done so in 2000 and 2003 mowing down about 150 Hindi-speaking poor workers from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. The leaders of ULFA are all Hindus, but speak the Assamese language. It often tends to be forgotten that in the 1980s they started their movement mainly to drive out millions of illegal Muslim migrants from Bangladesh. As they became dependent on the intelligence agencies of Bangladesh and Pakistan for money, training, arms and sanctuaries, these agencies intelligently manipulated them to give up their campaign against illegal Muslim migrants from Bangladesh and turn it instead against Hindus from other parts of India, who had settled down in Assam in order to earn their living.

Many of ULFA’s Hindu leaders, who enjoy the hospitality of Bangladeshi intelligence in Bangladeshi territory, have now become Hindu mercenaries, who are letting themselves be used by the intelligence agencies of two countries, who are India’s ill-wishers –Bangladesh and Pakistan — in order to fulfill their agenda of making Hindus kill Hindus for no other reason than that they speak different languages and come from different parts of India.

The extent to which they have come under the influence of Bangladeshi intelligence would be evident from the fact that while they target Hindus from other parts of India, force them to pay taxes and kill them, they never target Bengali-speaking Muslims from Bangladesh. In an editorial on November 9, 2006, The Sentinel, a daily newspaper published from Guwahati, commented on the targeting of Hindi-speaking civilians from other parts of India living and working in Assam: ‘Striking terror in the hearts of Hindi-speaking people of Asom is precisely what the jihadi elements of Bangladesh and the ISI (Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence) want for two reasons. In the first place, their identification with India is stronger than many others disillusioned by the Centre’s neglect of Asom.

‘Secondly, the Hindi-speaking people control the economy of Asom both as businessmen and as skilled manual workers. The forces inimical to the state want the economic vaccum that has stoked the illegal influx from Bangladesh to be intensified. However, none of this is unexpected. For over two decades, The Sentinel has constantly harped on the fact that it does not take long for a silent, unarmed invasion (My comment: Of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh) to turn into a violent armed invasion. We are beginning to see this happening. Over the years, the Asom government and the Centre chose to pay no attention. They are now about to reap as they have sown.’

Many non-governmental organisations have refrained from condemning ULFA’s targeted killings of innocent civilians. Instead, the focus of their campaign has been against the security forces. After the two explosions in Guwahati on November 5, 2006, these NGOs remained conspicuously silent on the brutal killing of the civilians, but instead blamed the government and the security forces for calling off the cessation of operations against ULFA on September 23, 2006. ‘The cessation had been announced on August 13, 2006, to facilitate peace talks with ULFA. Since there were indications that ULFA was exploiting this cessation to step up its fund collection drive through extortions and other activities and did not respond seriously to the government’s offer of peace talks, the cessation was called off. Some of these NGOs had organised a public meeting at Jorhat on November 7, 2006, under the auspices of the People’s Committee for Peace Initiatives in Asom. At this meeting, there was hardly any criticism of the brutal murder of civilians by ULFA on November 5. Instead, allegations were made that the security forces were committing atrocities against the civilians. Some of the points made by the Hindi-speaking residents of Assam in their letters to the local newspapers are disturbing.

‘One such letter published by the Assam Tribune on November 7, 2006, said: “Some people (in the PCG) even acted as coordinators in the ULFA diktat that all ‘Indians’ living in Asom must pay tax, an euphemism for extortion. But the same ULFA never utters a word about the millions of Bangladeshis illegally living in Asom in fear of displeasing their foreign masters. In other words, ‘Indians’ living in Asom must pay ‘tax’ or face bullets, but Bangladeshis can stay without any such fear.’

Since ULFA resumed its acts of terrorism in September last year after the collapse of the peace talks, it stepped up its use of Improvised Explosive Devices. The media in other parts of India failed to highlight the fact that many of these IEDs were planted in areas where Hindi-speaking people live in order to create panic among them. The December 2006 issue of Swadhinata (Freedom), an electronic newsletter of ULFA, had alleged that ‘outsiders’ had set up ‘mini Bihars’, ‘mini Rajasthans’ and ‘mini Bengals’ in different districts of Assam, and called for their ouster.

The present campaign against poor migrants from Bihar has come in the wake of this. The lack of a will — in Guwahati as well as in New Delhi — to act firmly against ULFA and its sponsors in Bangladesh is creating an extremely dangerous situation in Assam. It is now in hand of asom people to disarm ULFA by withdrawing their support from them.

Advertisements

One thought on “ULFA – new face of terror

  1. A classic misrepresentation of facts compounded by a north Indian cultural diatribe which makes this reading faulty on innumerable counts.

    First of all bringing Hindu-Muslim discourse into the Assamese subnationalism aspect is a sad reflection for the author who claims to be an astute socio-political blogger turned civil servant.

    While not agreeing to the forms of violence that ULFA has indulged in the author seems to have convieniently forgotten or perhaps lacks the knowledge of Army brutalities that have occured and still ocassionally continue to occur.That in a war such casualties are foregone conclusion is a valid statement but to put the blame solely on ULFA is gross injsutice.

    While never supporting the ULFA movement I do support the subnationalist cultural nation that is Assam and would like it to be protrayed in a proper manner.Articles like this tend to corrupt the view .

    I would suggest the author to do some reading including Sanjay Barua’s India Divided instead of relying on Dainik Jagaran and Daink Bhaskars explanation of events.

    The good point being atleast an attempt is being made to dissect the NE caludron and Assam in particular.

    Like

Express yourself

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s